H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 has passed the house and is headed to the senate.
I have included the summary description below for more understanding, but generally it amends the Homeland Security Act to include “homegrown terrorism”.
If enacted, the department of homeland security would establish permanent institutions on University campuses to study homegrown terrorism. They would also investigate anyone whom has an “extreme view” or “ideologically opposes the government”.
![]()
Ron Paul on HR1955: “This legislation focuses the weight of the US government inward toward its own citizens under the guise of protecting us against “violent radicalization…….There are many causes for concern in HR 1955. The legislation specifically singles out the Internet for “facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process” in the United States. Such language may well be the first step toward US government regulation of what we are allowed to access on the Internet. Are we, for our own good, to be subjected to the kind of governmental control of the Internet that we see in unfree societies? This bill certainly sets us on that course.”
![]()
“If you understand what his bill does, it really sets the stage for further criminalization of protest. This is the way our democracy little, by little, by little, is being stripped away from us. This bill, I believe, is a clear violation of the first amendment.”
This bill leaves a lot of open questions: In certain cases could Iraq war protesters be considered ideologically opposed to the government? Are protesters, muckrakers, minorities grouped in with homegrown terrorism?
SUMMARY: Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
Amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to add provisions concerning the prevention of homegrown terrorism (terrorism by individuals born, raised, or based and operating primarily in the United States).
Directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to: (1) establish a grant program to prevent radicalization (use of an extremist belief system for facilitating ideologically-based violence) and homegrown terrorism in the United States; (2) establish or designate a university-based Center of Excellence for the Study of Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism in the United States; and (3) conduct a survey of methodologies implemented by foreign nations to prevent radicalization and homegrown terrorism.
Prohibits the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to prevent ideologically-based violence and homegrown terrorism from violating the constitutional and civil rights, and civil liberties, of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents.”
Here is Amy Goodman on DemocracyNow discussing the bill
3 responses so far ↓
1 David // Dec 10, 2007 at 8:25 am
First I wikipedia The Act then I google searched for the Damn Thing. The wording is … lose and that alone is scary the fact that SEC. 899C. L says thatFederal Advisory Committee Actdoes not have a say in what they are doing and that they are not held accountable by FAC Act is scary. The basics and most of it however I kind of agree with. I just think this is could be like having wolf to protect the hen house. They (this committee) can do just about anything as I read it and pull people out of there jobs (kind of like jury duty but with less fear of retribution by there employer) to get it done. There is even part where it seems like they don’t have to report there budget wts is that? Anyway where was Ron Paul when this was voted on anyway?
2 David // Dec 10, 2007 at 8:27 am
I used anyway twice in that last sentence.
3 Travis // Dec 10, 2007 at 7:12 pm
Ron Paul was apparently at another event and couldn’t vote. I wish he would have voted on it.
Leave a Comment